CfP SSSI Annual Meetings 2017

The Call for Papers for the 2017 SSSI Annual meetings has just been published on our website. For the call, please go here:

Posted in #sssi, Announcement, Annual Conference, Interactionism, SSSI, symbolic interaction | Leave a comment

The best albums of 2016 in my opinion

With the new year approaching, I look forward to many new posts concerning the intersection of music and society on this blog.  At the same time, I wanted to close out the year by simply doing what almost every other media and commentary source about music does every year at this time.  As such, here are my own best albums (limited to 25 and only to new releases) of the year presented without comment for anyone’s interest or consideration.  See you all here in the new year, j

  1. Sturgill Simpson – A sailor’s guide to earth
  2. BJ Barham – Rockingham
  3. Miranda Lambert – the weight of these wings
  4. A Tribe Called Quest – We got it from here…thank you 4 your service
  5. Various Artists – Pink Floyd’s Wish You Were Here Symphonic
  6. Amanda Shires – My piece of land
  7. Mavis Staples – Living on a high note
  8. Against Me – Shape Shift with me
  9. Alicia Keys – Here
  10. Wilco – Schmilco
  11. Beyonce – Lemonade
  12. The Head and the Heart – Signs of Life
  13. Kendrick Lamar – untitled unmastered
  14. Nice as Fuck – Eponymous
  15. PJ Harvey – The hope six demolition party
  16. Usher – Hard II Love
  17. Lady Gaga – Joanne
  18. Garth Brooks – Gunslinger
  19. Norah Jones – Day Breaks
  20. Leonard Cohen – you want it darker
  21. KT Tunstall – KIN
  22. Lucinda Williams – the Ghosts of Highway 20
  23. Tegan and Sara – Love you to death
  24. Radiohead – A Moon Shaped Pool
  25. Metallica – Hard wired to self destruct
Posted in Blog, Discussion, Music, music sssi | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Event Specific Playlists

In recent weeks, I have enjoyed a series of posts people have made in various corner of the internet sharing playlists they have created for processing the results of the recent U.S. Presidential election.  Roaming around online, I have seen such playlists show up from people on the left, people on the right, and moderates alike, and though the contents – not surprisingly – of the playlists differ greatly between these groups, each seeks to use music to make sense of the event and what may follow it.  I have also noticed quite a bit of variation between individuals’ – even with similar political and other demographic leanings and statuses – and enjoyed the varied ways people utilize different musical tastes to express similar points and reactions.  As someone who rarely spends much time at all without music playing nearby, I’ve really enjoyed both remembering songs I haven’t listened to in a while and even learning new ones to try while reading these shared and otherwise posted playlists.

At the same time, the amount of people sharing such lists following the U.S. Presidential election led me to start thinking about what I would call, for lack of a better term, event specific playlists and the roles such list might play in our emotional and cognitive processing and experiences.  I think about people I’ve seen post “wedding day playlists,” “final exam playlists,” “anniversary playlists” (related to various kinds of anniversaries), and a wide variety of other examples.  On my own computer every day, I have a “fiction” playlist that contains the main musical numbers I listened to when crafting each of my novels because sometimes I listen to them when I’m struggling with a story.  I’ve also seen people post playlists for various recreation activities, such as “Going to the River Songs” and “Girls Night Out Playlist” at times over the years.  I’ve also seen playlists posted online or shared between friends that remember specific things, people, places or events – “Songs that take me back to Georgia” or “Remembering Mama Playlist,” for examples.  In all such cases, people experience or process specific events in the life course with the use of songs that, at least for them, speak to those events.  Simply put, these playlists represent people’s attempts, best I can tell and I admit I do it to, to create soundtracks for their lives, emotions, and concerns.

Especially as I’ve been studying and becoming more active in arts-based research throughout this year, this strikes me as an interesting question that could be examined by interactionists focuses on relationships between music and society.  How do people narrate their lives through the use of songs and albums?  What playlists might people form to explain their reactions to varied life events like elections, graduations, breakups, first loves, and many other major moments?  What might we learn about the influence of art on identity and narrative creation, and what might we learn about broader patterns of narrative and identity creation from such studies?  What lessons might we learn about events and the ways people experience them by examining the playlists created by this or that group (and especially those shared widely) after such events?  I don’t know what the answers might be, but I think this could be an interesting line of inquiry.

Alongside the questions above, I think I’ll close this post by sharing some of the songs I have most often listened to following the recent election, and in so doing, potentially share some of the enjoyment I’ve gotten reading and thinking about the lists shared by others.  Alongside the songs listed below, I’ve found myself listening to a couple of complete albums fairly regularly in the last few weeks – “We got it from here…thank you for your service” by A Tribe Called Quest and “The Ghost of Tom Joad” by Bruce Springsteen.  Alongside those two albums, here are some of the other songs (I limited it to ten) I listen to these days when I think about the recent election:

American Skin (41 Shots) – Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band

Transgender Dysphoria Blues – Against Me

Pray to Jesus – Brandy Clark

Don’t Die – Killer Mike

Crucify – Tori Amos 

Not Ready – Dixie Chicks 

Formation – Beyonce 

Bend before it Breaks – Brandi Carlile 

We’ve been had – Uncle Tupelo 

Inside Job – Pearl Jam 







Posted in Blog, Music, music sssi, Reflection | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Writing Fuel

A few years ago, I had a nice conversation about writing habits with a colleague who cares very little for music except when she is writing. While she almost never listened to music at any other time, she noted how her writing process is intimately tied to the types of music – mostly jazz from the 70’s and 80’s – she plays while she works on this or that paper. As we were talking that day, another person sitting nearby admitted surprise that we could write while music was playing. This other person loved music, but could not concentrate on writing if it was playing nearby, and noted that the times where they were working on this or that composition were generally the quietest times in their home. As someone who generally has music playing at all times – or as much as possible – and has not – that I can recall – ever written anything without a soundtrack playing in the background, I found the variation in our three experiences fascinating and have often thought about them over the years.

In my own case, I’ve often referred to music as my writing fuel, or a source of energy, inspiration, and ideas I draw upon whenever I’m writing in any way. Though I’m relatively certain few other people would guess this, I can actually look at each of the articles, chapters, essays, short stories, books, newspaper pieces, and other published works throughout my career and remember exactly what songs or artists were dominating my stereos at the time of their composition, editing, and submissions. At present, for example, I’m writing this post while Brandi Carlile’s Give Up the Ghost plays on repeat from my laptop, and my part of my most recent co-authored journal article (forthcoming in Symbolic Interaction) was written almost entirely to the sounds of Amanda Shires Down Fell the Doves. I’ve never tried to pinpoint what, if any, explicit role these soundtracks play in my compositions, but at this point I honestly can’t imagine what writing without music playing would be like. However it actually works inside my head, music seems to be an integral part of my own experience of and ability to write.

I’ve found myself returning to the above conversation more and more this year as I expanded my writing efforts to the composition of sociologically informed novels. As I recently noted elsewhere, I decided to begin working in research-based fiction both in hopes of fulfilling a lifelong dream of publishing a novel, and as an attempt to translate sociological insights – and especially insights concerning marginalized groups often left out of mainstream scientific studies and data sets – for broader academic, student, and public audiences. In the process, however, I kept running into elements of the conversation above as I found myself arranging the stories I composed around particular songs that caught my attention, spoke to some element of the social issues contained within the work, and / or provided an organizing theme or feeling for the work. Even more so than the non-fiction writing I’ve done throughout my career, the music in each case served as an inspirational and organizational fuel for turning complex findings from various academic literatures into useful characters, plots and narrative arcs. As I completed my first four novels, and the contract for publishing the first one as part of the Social Fictions Series edited by Dr. Patricia Leavy, I found myself thinking about two questions I have been wondering about ever since that conversation years ago.

First, in what ways do other people use music as fuel for their writing, thinking, and other creative and academic endeavors? I automatically think about my life partner situating autoethnographic experiences within the contexts of storylines from some of their favorite bands and analyzing the emotions the combination of these data points reflect in their writing, analysis, and conceptualization. I also think about my colleague that writes to music, but only music without lyrics – even though he also likes music with lyrics outside of writing time – because while instrumental flourishes inspire his thought processes, lyrics will distract him from the same processes. I also think about the colleague that completes every writing project by dancing around to their favorite records whether or not they listen to those records while writing in the first place. I think about these and other examples, compare them to my own experience, and compare them to the people I met years ago. In so doing, I wonder about all the different ways music informs and / or becomes relevant in writing processes and rituals.

Second, and admittedly a curiosity I cannot really speak to myself, I wonder what other things serve as writing fuel for people. I wonder what other people draw on – consciously or unconsciously – when fashioning their own ideas. If not music, what is in the background of their writings, arguments, creations, and conceptualizations? I know, for example, friends who go to art galleries in search of ideas, and others who pull heavily from day-to-day interactions and conversations. I admit I pull from these arenas as well, but music is my primary background component in writing and that makes me wonder what, if anything, plays the same role for other writers. I have no clue what the answers might be, or even if people would be aware of the answers without reflecting on their writing habits for a bit, but I bet the question alone could tell each of us a lot about our writing selves and the influences that find voice within our own words.

J. Sumerau

Posted in Music, music sssi, Reflection | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Start Again

As I noted in a previous post, my life partner and I went to once again feed my never ending desire to see the Counting Crows live as many times as possible back in July. During that particular show under the moonlight of a Tampa summer night, the band played a soft, haunting version of Start Again (a song they released on an album full of songs they covered by artists – like Teenage Fanclub, the band that originally did Start Again – they enjoyed). As I was listening to this version again a couple days ago when the recording of the show we ordered from the Counting Crows website arrived in the mail, it reminded me of the enthusiasm and joy I experience every time I come into contact with new music and especially newly acquired albums regardless of their ultimate quality in the long run.

While I was taking a little break from new posts here on the SSSI music blog, I spent a lot of time becoming acquainted with new – at least to me in each case – music as the summer shifted into fall. Although not exactly planned this time, the process began when I acquired a nice little gift card that allowed me to purchase nine records by a few artists I long wanted to give a more detailed or thorough listening. I spent the entire time I was in Seattle for this year’s SSSI, ASA, and ASR meetings roaming around the city listening to and honestly falling in love with Margo Price and Courtney Barnett and American Aquarium as well as a couple other new to me artists I became acquainted with at the time. When I arrived back home after the conferences, the process continued as two of my favorite artists – Wilco and Amanda Shires – released new studio albums to welcome me to the fall semester of classes. When the official bootleg recording of the latest Counting Crows show my life partner and I attended appeared in the mail earlier this week, I again began thinking about the ways I experience newly acquired musical stories.

For me, the experience of gaining new music – especially if it turns out to be something I really like or even love over time – never fails to elevate my moods, captivate my always on the edge of getting distracted by something else attention, and feel like a brand new adventure containing an infinite number of possibilities. I find myself wondering what major moment in my life will become associated with, for example, Margo Price’s “Four Years of Chances” or Amanda Shires’ “My Love – the Storm.” I find myself imagining, or trying to, what interesting papers I might write while Wilco’s “Happiness” or K Phillips’ “Hadrian” plays in the background. I consider what new friends might emerge from the introduction of some new album, like the latest one from the Head and the Heart, to a friend of mine unfamiliar with that band before now. Since I never write without music, I try to guess on first listen which of the new songs in the collection will end up on one my writing playlists or which new vinyl records will get the most play when I’m editing manuscripts over the years. Since my artistic, creative writing and storytelling always seems to be inspired by and often named after songs, I wonder which – if any – of the songs will do this work in my head, become titles of stories or poems or other creative endeavors, and / or provide a theme to unify a given story or poem I have yet to imagine.

Even though there are many cases (so many) where none of the new songs or records will be an answer to any of these questions, I always enjoy attempting, in every case of starting to listen to something different again, to envision what – if any – role the new pieces of art ringing in my ears will play in the context of my own life course and ongoing self and narrative constructions. It is with this in mind that I wonder how other people engage fresh forms of art – musically or otherwise – for themselves, with others, and in the context of the rest of the meaning making that makes up a given individual and collective life course. What might Interactionists learn from exploring these questions systematically, and what might any one of us learning from thinking about these questions next time we pick up another new piece of art and start again the process of integrating this new element into our own world?

J. Sumerau

Posted in Blog, Discussion, Music, music sssi, Reflection | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Improvisation versus Familiarity

This past week, my life partner and I went to see the Counting Crows perform live. It was not the first time we saw the band live, and unless they retire, it won’t be the last. This time, however, I did something after the show I had never done before, and in so doing, noticed an interesting dichotomy. What I did was follow, read, and think about comments on social media about the show itself, and the ways people interpreted the performance. The dichotomy I noticed revolved around tensions between attendees who hoped for the familiarity of songs they had on records at home, and other attendees who enjoyed the ways the band reinvents songs on stage over time.

Similar to acts often labeled as jam bands, the Counting Crows have a long standing reputation – dating back to the earliest days of the band actually – for revising and adjusting their songs over time to the point where even someone who has seen them many times (like me) never knows exactly what to expect or which versions of the songs might pop up in a show. Sometimes they add in or delete instrumental interludes and solos into songs that sounded different or even used different instruments on their studio records. Sometimes they insert pieces of other songs – their own and those by other people – into the middle of some of their more famous songs. Sometimes, they even re-write whole songs – instrumentally or lyrically – from tour to tour, and experiment with various arrangements of different songs. In all such cases, the shows often feel like a bit of improv mixed into familiar music, and songs one may know every word to from an album can become entirely different creations in the midst of the show.

For an example, check out this live version of Round Here, and then check out the studio version of the same song.

Now, I’ll admit my own bias here. I like this approach, and I actually wish artists did it more often, and tend to love it when other artists do it as well. For me, the songs feel more alive when they change over time, and the concert feels more like its own experience when the songs don’t exactly match the studio album versions. That said, even before reading comments online following the recent show, I was well aware that other listeners do not like these things, and I see no reason to pretend my preference is any better or worse than theirs in any objective sense. Rather, what struck me as I read the comments was that the show was either “the best ever” or “completely terrible” depending on which side of this line the commenter was coming from in the first place. This interpretive variation is what caught my attention.

It reminded me of many other cases where I see tension between improvisation (or something new and unexpected) and familiarity (or something that fits existing expectations). I think about colleagues and I reading the same manuscript – as reviewers or more informally – and reaching completely different about what constitutes a “contribution” (for example, an addition to an existing line of argument versus a wholly new perspective).  I think of debates concerning static versus fluid ways of thinking, ways of being, ways of studying, and ways of interpreting the world (i.e., those who see an obvious truth versus those who see subjective possibilities). I think about these and so many more situations where familiarity (and the desire for that) clashes with improvisation (and the desire for something different) throughout social relations, and I wonder, as suggested in a recent SI article by Dunn and Creek, just how many social debates and conflicts stem from such clashes repetitively playing out in our world.

J. Sumerau

Posted in Blog, concerts, Interactionism, Music, music sssi | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

The Theoretical Intersection of Science and Music – An Abstract

In this post, Dr. Joseph Kotarba shares the abstract from a recent keynote talk he gave in Bulgaria at the Seventh Annual Conference of the ESSSI and will elaborate on as well at the upcoming SSSI annual meetings.  

The Theoretical Intersection of Science and Music

Keynote Address

The Seventh Annual Conference of the ESSSI

Topola, Bulgaria

(July 2016)


Joseph A. Kotarba, Ph.D.

Department of Sociology

Texas State University

San Marcos, Texas U.S.A.


Institute for Translational Sciences

University of Texas Medical Branch

Galveston, Texas U.S.A.


The purpose of this presentation is to discuss the value of applying the interactionist concept of the self to understanding the contemporary biomedical scientist. Translational science (TS) is a growing scientific movement that aims to facilitate the efficient application of bio-medical research to clinical services design and delivery (i.e., improving the “bench-to-bedside” process). Since 2010, I have served as a member of an interdisciplinary team charged to evaluate the progress of the NIH’s Clinical and Translational Science Award received by the Institute for Translational Sciences at the University of Texas Medical Branch-Galveston. The program’s administrators initially framed their interest in understanding empirical and thus measurable organizational change in terms of deliverables such as patents, external grants and publications, as well as formal rule application. I focused my research on a bit more elusive phenomenon: cultural change. Following Gary Fine, I argued that cultural activity and change occurs at the local, medical center level and do not result directly from NIH policies and dictates. I agree with Robert Dingwall and Phil Strong that organizations are the products of their members’ actions in circumstances that are not entirely of their own making, although allowing scope for manipulation and maneuver. Patrick McGinty offered a corrective that argued that interactionism allows for both social organizational analysis as well as organizational ethnography. Accordingly, my primary research design evolved to seeing the self-experience of the scientist as the media by which culture at all organizational levels impacts the work of science, while also providing a scholarly resource for understanding the impact of contemporary science on the everyday life of the individual scientist. In this presentation, I choose music as an important cultural resource that links the scientific/rational aspects of self to the aesthetic/humanistic aspects of self. Thus, cultural experiences like music reinforce the esteemed self-definition of “intellectual”; functions as an escape from overrationalized expectations of others (NIH); facilitates interface with if not return to the community through activities such as symphony board membership; provides an alternative outlet for creativity and innovation such as the “wedding mix;” and provides another outlet for orderliness such as archiving music and delving into music history. The ideal “deliverable” is the balanced self.


This study was conducted with the support of the Institute for Translational Sciences at the

University of Texas Medical Branch, supported in part by a Clinical and Translational Science Award (UT1TR000071) from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health.

Posted in #sssi, Annual Conference, Blog, Discussion, Guest Post, Interactionism, Music, music sssi, Research, SSSI | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment